TIME MANAGEMENT AND RISK FACTORS IN LIFE-THREATENING ANCA-VASCULITIS

BackgroundAccuracy of diagnosis and prompt therapeutic intervention are the mainstay in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis(AAV) suffering from life-threatening complications [1].However, there is no definition of therapeutic window in vital AAV, nor its impact on patient outcome regarding length of hospital stay, intensive care unit(ICU) admission or survival.ObjectivesThe aim of the study is to analyze the process of care from the perspective of time management in vital organ involvement AAV patients and to identify potential risk factors for ICU admission.MethodsA retrospective multicenter study identified AAV patients with life-threatening organ involvement, defined as alveolar hemorrhage, rapidly progressive renal failure, myocarditis and cerebral granuloma. Demographic data was collected. Key time frames were recorded, namely the interval from acute symptom onset to hospital presentation, days until imaging(plain X-ray, cardiac ultrasound, CT-scan), time to therapeutic intervention with corticosteroids or biologic/non-biologic immunosuppression(cyclophosphamide or rituximab) and to renal replacement therapy(RRT) or plasmapheresis. Time to ICU admission, hospital length-of-stay, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score(BVAS) were also noted. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and Chi-square and Pearson correlation tests were applied.Results66 patients with AAV were enrolled, out of which 17 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Mean age in the study group was 58.6±11.1 years old,10 patients(58.8%) were females and 7 (41.2%) males.11(64.7%) patients were c-ANCA positive, while 6 (35.3%) had p-ANCA and all were diagnosed with AAV prior to life-threatening event. Two patients had COVID-19 triggered AAV.In the study group, the most frequent critical organ suffering was rapidly progressive renal failure(12), followed by alveolar hemorrhages(10), 2 cerebral granulomas and one acute myocarditis. Three patients(17.6%) had more than one vital manifestation. Ten patients(58.8%) had more than three additional non-organ-threatening manifestations. Mean interval from AAV diagnosis to emergency admission was 30.1± 61.1 days, median 3 and from severe episode onset to hospitalization 1.65±0.18 days, median 1. There was only one death in the study group. Three patients were admitted in the ICU in 0.59±1.5 days following hospital presentation and required either RRT or plasma exchange within 2.66 days. Imaging examination was performed unanimously the day upon hospital admission. All patients received corticosteroids in the first 5.95±14.3 days, while immunosuppression was given to 13(76.5%) patients within 11.5±15.5 days from hospitalization.12 patients(70.5%) suffered from associated infections. Mean BVAS(13.6±6.76) correlated to ICU admission(p 0.013, r 0.58).Patients in ICU revealed higher BVAS(22±9.53) versus non-ICU(11.8±4.76).Hospital length of stay was 14.7±10.7 days(median 14) and showed no relationship to the type of severe organ involvement. The need for ICU caring was dominant in males(p 0.05) and confirmed in patients with proteinuria(p 0.012) and at least two major organ damage.ConclusionThis study shows that severity risk factors for potential ICU admission for life-threatening AAV appear to be male gender, proteinuria and the number of affected organs.Moreover, BVAS should be considered a useful tool to predict patients' risk for intensive care management since a higher score indicates a more aggressive disease.However, time to investigational or therapeutic intervention did not correlate to patient outcome in AAV.References[1]Geetha, D., Seo, P. (2011). Life-Threatening Presentations of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. In: Khamashta, M., Ramos-Casals, M. (eds) Autoimmune Diseases. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-358-9_8Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

COVID-19, a phantomatic trigger for relapsing polychondritis

Relapsing polychondritis (RP) is an auto-immune disease which affects the cartilaginous parts of sites like the ear, nose or upper respiratory tract. The condition can also involve other cartilage-containing structures such as the eyes, joints, the heart, kidneys and central nervous system. Early diagnosis of RPis essential for preventing significant damage to vital organs that can lead to increased morbi-mortality rates. First-line therapy in RP is systemic glucocorticoids, while in refractory cases monoclonal antibodies can be used despite scarcity of efficacy data available in published literature. The link between RP and neoplasia, especially hematological malignancy, should not be omitted when screening patients with suspicion of RP diagnosis. The onset of COVID-19 pandemic has generated a new source of immune mediated pathologies, such as small vessel vasculitis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura or Guillain-Barre syndrome and other auto-inflammatory syndromes triggered by COVID-19 seem to unveil. The present case depicts a female patient who presented with erythematous and painful areas of her right ear after priorly experiencing similar episodes in both ears and nose bridge shortly after having the COVID-19 vaccine booster dose. © 2022, Amaltea Medical Publishing House. All rights reserved.

IMPLICATIONS OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

The global order was facing multiple challenges even before the pandemic, so it is very likely - based on the evolutions recorded since the beginning of 2020 - that these challenges will further amplify. On the impact of COVID-19 on the world order, opinions of political scientists vary greatly, from reserved optimism to worst-case scenario, from treating it as a simple inflexion point to forecasting the transformative changes it will entail. In this article we argue that this current pandemic will only accelerate previous trends by deepening international power competition, thus accelerating the transition towards a more realist world order. This working hypothesis disregards potential non-linear events that might occur from this point on and that could impact all forecasts(1). In this article we discuss the structure of the current international system and we analyse recent developments, thus trying to determine which specific trends will be accelerated. Furthermore, we examine the "lessons" learned so far and try to determine what can be done to limit the consequences of the pandemic, at least at the national level.

Motivation of healthcare providers during COVID19 pandemic outbreak

Background: Since the beginning of 2020, the medical staff caring for patients with rheumatic disorders has been exposed to considerable emotional and physical stress due to the COVID19 pandemic outbreak. Newly-designed circuits were imposed to better manage chronic patient admissions. Objectives: To assess the level of motivation in healthcare personnel caring for patients with rheumatic disorders and identify determinants that lead to dissatisfaction during the COVID19 spread. Methods: A 15-item questionnaire was distributed among medical and paramedical staff looking after chronic rheumatic patients. Motivation factors were included in questions having five preset answers, ranging from not al all, to a small extent, moderately, to a large extent and to a very large extent. The final item was an open-type question, favoring personal suggestions and potential changes in local management. Results: Out of a total of a 124 responders, 82 were doctors with various degrees in training (fellow trainees, specialists in Rheumatology, Head of Department), 37 medical assistants, 3 nurses, a physical therapist, one clinical psychologist. Mean age in the group was 38.3 years old with a strikingly female dominance (87.6%). Within the responders, the financial factor represented by monthly salary or bonuses had no or little impact on work motivation during the pandemic since more than 70% answered with not al all / to a small extent / moderately. Regarding motivation through working hours, 26.7% responded either not at all or to a small extent, 32.4% were moderately motivated while only 12.4% were more enthusiastic. More than half (53.4%) of the staff stated that motivation was not entirely affected by working conditions in the hospital. Answers were relatively equally divided referring to motivation by safety at their workplace (almost 20% for each statement), and 40.9% suffered some extent of demotivation due to risk of contamination while caring for COVID19 positive patients. 42% of the staff was only moderately motivated by hospital's measure to limit the spread of COVID throughout the personnel. Almost 75% of the healthcare workers were not motivated by news media. Around 54% said that personal motivation was not influenced by a larger work volume and 43% were very much motivated by work relationships with colleagues. 41% of the staff is only moderately satisfied with their work during the COVID outbreak while 18% are not at all satisfied. Finally, the last open-question confirmed that for some the pandemic period was a time to bring healthcare professionals together to a stronger bond. Other responders felt that chronic rheumatic patients were left aside, while caring mostly for COVID19 patients and only limited admissions for life-threatening conditions. Moreover, medical staff suggested that the lack of a more frequent testing throughout the personnel to avoid contamination was demotivating, while still living with families or relatives. Conclusion: Motivation of the personnel is a process with great economic and social impact. This study challenged the level of healthcare staff in difficult times caused by medical crisis. Results of the enquiry showed that financial benefits had no impact on motivation. Harsher working conditions or larger volume did not negatively impact motivation of staff, but the fear of contamination was considerable. Apparently the media influence was not a motivator for medical staff during the outbreak. Medical teams should find their stamina until the end of pandemia.

How did COVID-19 affect patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases treated with dmards-experience from a romanian rheumatology hospital?

Background: Certainly, the year 2020 changed the healthcare system due to SARS-CoV2 pandemic that affected globally, more than 100 million people, causing more than 2 million of deaths worldwide. The evidence of how this infection impact patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases treated with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs is still an unmet need. Objectives: The main focus of this study is to evaluate the influence of DMARDs therapy on the evolution of COVID-19 disease in patients with RMDs. The second objective is to study and find correlations between the severity of infection in patients with rheumatic diseases. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted between June 2020 and January 2021, enrolling 81 patients with rheumatic diseases that went through SARS-CoV2 infection. The data was collected using patients' clinical documents and through telemedicine, in accordance with EULAR COVID-19 Rheumatological Database. Results: Among the 81 patients, 53 (65,43%) were females and 28 (34,56%) were males. The mean age was 47,9 years old (49,49 years old for females and 45,25 years old for males). The majority lives in urban areas -62 patients (76,54%). The temporal trends of COVID-19 observed in this cohort was in consonance with the evolution of the pandemic in Romania: one third of cases were recorded between June and October 2020 and two-thirds between November 2020 and January 2021, when the number of COVID-19 cases tripled in the general population. Surprisingly, more than 27% of patients in this study were asymptomatic at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. They were tested according to the protocol before admission to the hospital. 9,8% of patients also asymptomatic, were tested positive as a screening before leaving the country. The majority (45,6%) were symptomatic or contact with someone infected with SARS-CoV2-and tested positive with RT-PCR. We divided the cohort in 3 groups: patients with mild infection that required no hospitalization (22 patients counting for 27,16%), moderate infection -hospitalization but not in the Intensive Care Unit (52 patients -64,19%) and severe infection -admission to the ICU/deaths (7 patients in the ICU, 4 deaths -4,9%). Mild and moderate COVID 19 disease was identified in patients with axial spondyloarthtis (56,7%), with remission or with low disease activity, with a few or no comorbidities, with a mean age of 47,56 years old and also in patients in treatment with MTX (14,86%) or TNF alfa inhibitors (35,13%). 51% of patients stopped the therapy during COVID19 diseases. Factors correlated with severe infection and death were age (the mean age was 62,14), high and moderate disease activity RA, overlap syndromes (RA with SLE or Sjogren Syndrome) and important cardiovascular comorbidities. Two of the deceased patients were in treatment with MTX and RTX (the last infusion was more than 6 months). Conclusion: The data in our study suggests that the use of cs DMARDs (MTX) and TNF alfa inhibitors is associated with better outcomes for patients with RMDs and COVID-19. These results are in accordance with the data found in literature [1,2,3]. The limitation of this study is the little number of patients and the fact that the real number of COVID-19 cases might be higher in reality due to asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic patients.